|
Click on a vase to enlarge view
From
tallest to shortest; shape number 84 hand thrown and carved vase
23.5 cm tall, painted by Anne Godfrey 1965-70; shape number 83 hand thrown and carved vase
15 cm tall, painted by Christine Tate 1966-70; and shape number 92 hand thrown and carved
bowl 10.5 cm tall, painted by Christine Tate 1966-70. During this
period Christine was the Delphis section supervisor
Click on a vase to enlarge view
From largest to
smallest; shape number 80 hand thrown and carved planter 21.5 cm tall, painted by Christine Tate
1966-70; shape
number79 hand thrown planter 13.5cm tall,
painted by Jean Millership1966-69;
and shape
number78 hand thrown planter 11cm tall,
painted by Jean Millership1966-69.
Some
of these vases and bowls were deliberately thrown thickly (according to
Guy Sydenham by some of the less experienced throwers in the craft
section), and once the clay was in a
"leather hard" state, the sides were decorated by carving.
Click on a pot to enlarge view

Carved
Delphis Bowls - Various Sizes From
the biggest to smallest; shape number
89, 28cm diameter, Pamela Bevans
1970; shape number
88, 21cm diameter, Patricia wells 1967; shape number 87, 16cm diameter, unsigned;
shape number 86, 13cm diameter, Angela
Wyburgh 1968,: and the smallest has no shape
number, 11cm diameter,
Patrica Churchouse 1966.
Click on a
pot to enlarge view
From
the top clockwise; large
footed
Delphis bowl, no shape number, 18cm in diameter, Painted by Pamela
Bevans in 1970; footed
Delphis bowl, shape number
38, 12cm in diameter, painted by Christine Tate between 1964 and 1970; Poole Studio bowl, (no shape number)
2.5cm in diameter painted by Patricia Churchouse
between 1964 and 1966; small
Delphis bowl, no shape number,13cm diameter painted by Margaret
Anderson in 1966 or 1967.
The
Delphis glazes were standardised
in 1971, to more or less four colours (red,
orange yellow, green) with an occasional blue. Delphis was selling
faster than it could be made there was also a problem with wastage. The
"Blythe" glazes used were very expensive and would sometimes blacken in firing, and at its worse this could
obliterate the design completely, the resultant pottery being
smashed. Janet Laird's career at Poole spanned this period.
Joining the pottery in 1969 she was Delphis supervisor from 1970 until
1974. She told me, "when the Poole Pottery glazes started
to really turn black, it was probably due to the volume put on a Top Hat
kiln. When you have a large collection of red glaze & copper oxides it
turns the other glazes black, apart from yellow. When Delphis started to
go into production that was the problem, so the glazes had to be changed".
The
pots above above predate this change.
These are decorated in the
red, orange and yellow cadmium selenium glazes that first characterized
Delphis ware, alongside
other colours, that as a whole appear to
have been more reactive/unpredictable in firing. This, of course lead to their
discontinuation, but also demonstrates how their unpredictability can produce a
quite magical happenstance. (For example, some will bubble during firing giving an
"orange peel" effect while, depending on the conditions within the
kiln, both the transparent "cobalt like" blue and the aqua green
glazes oxidize to black, just enough, at the edges, or in places completely!) Again
from Janet, "We loved the mixture of glazes that we used ,so many
colours & lots of really lovely work was produced. There was
some beautiful work produced also with the "Ferro Glazes"
especially the 16 inch chargers when more time was spent on them. If you
put lots of layers on you get the broken effect with the red breaking
through." Many,
though not all, of the pots below date
after 1971and are decorated with the later Ferro glazes.
Click on a vase to enlarge view
Back row from left to right; shape number 15,
Rocket vase 23.5cm tall, painted by Valerie
Pullen 1974-75; shape number 15,
Rocket vase 23.5cm tall, painted by Ros Sommerfelt
1970-71&76; shape
number 84, Dumbbell vase 23cm tall, painted by Judy Evens
1974-76. Front row; shape number 32,
Onion vase 12.5cm tall, painted by Cynthia
Bennett 1971-77; shape
number 83, hand thrown vase 15cm tall, painted by Lynn
Gregory 1970-74: and shape number
83, hand thrown vase 15cm tall, painted by Carol
Cutler 1969-76.
Click on a vase to enlarge view

Back
left, footed bowl shape
number 76 painted by Julia Wills in 1971
or 72. Right, shape number 57, 27cm
diameter, painted by Anne Godfrey between 1968 and 1970. Front left, shape number
56, painted by Mary
Albon between 1970 and 1972.
Click on a vase to enlarge view

Back
left, large planter, shape
number 74, 13cm tall, painted by Mary Albon between 1970 and 1972;
right medium size planter, shape
number 73, 11cm tall, painted by Wendy Smith between 1976 and
1977. Front left, small planter, shape
number 72, 8.5cm tall, painted by Wendy Smith between 1976 and 1977;
right, straight sided bowl, shape
number 94, 6.5cm tall, painted by Jacqueline
Mackenzie between 1972 and 1979.
Click on a
pot to enlarge view

Dumbbell vase
no. 84, 23cm tall, painted by Judy Evens 1974-76 and Spear Shaped Sweet
Dish, no. 82, painted by Valerie
Pullen 1974-75
The
two pots above, are my best examples, of the post-1971 Ferro glazes
working just well enough together. I
do quite like the Jean Miro/Native North American looking design on the spear dish, and the glazes too work
"OK", but the colours just sit on top of each other in pools and there's no interaction or reaction between the glazes.
With the earlier Delphis glazes you can see that the glazes have fused together in the kiln and you can imagine that, when the kiln was opened, the artist might not only have felt relief at the survival of the pots but also real surprise at the magic that had gone on inside the kiln.
Without this element of serendipity, to my eyes, these later pots can sometimes look a bit
flat. This is particularly the case, where the orange or green grounds are used, the ones I've seen anyway, they either they "work", like the ones above,
or appear to fail quite badly, the colours sliding, running, marbling on the surface, but never interacting. It's like either the kiln made no magic, and the potters got out, just what they
expected - exactly what they put in, or else some sort of reverse alchemy took
place - they put in gold and took out....
|